Comments on: Pattern Formats and Structures http://patternlanguagenetwork.wordpress.com/2008/09/23/pattern-formats-and-structures/ Taming web2.0 in Higher Education Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:46:22 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Finalising a pattern structure « The Pattern Language Network http://patternlanguagenetwork.wordpress.com/2008/09/23/pattern-formats-and-structures/#comment-158 Finalising a pattern structure « The Pattern Language Network Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:38:49 +0000 http://patternlanguagenetwork.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-158 [...] some changes some time ago based on the PLML pattern elements - the resulting discussion was then summarised by Jim. I’d like to take that further now and propose an actual specification for the structure. I [...] [...] some changes some time ago based on the PLML pattern elements – the resulting discussion was then summarised by Jim. I’d like to take that further now and propose an actual specification for the structure. I [...]

]]> By: Janet Finlay http://patternlanguagenetwork.wordpress.com/2008/09/23/pattern-formats-and-structures/#comment-115 Janet Finlay Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:02:15 +0000 http://patternlanguagenetwork.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-115 I think it can be simpler than this. What we have at present are clearly protopatterns. If we are considering altering and expanding the form for full patterns (to be more akin to PLML) then we could introduce this as a second stage, leaving the current form as the protopattern form. What we then need is scaffolding for people to move from one stage to the next. I am working on that at the moment - we have a follow on workshop with the ALiC user group in the planning stage (will post details shortly) and this will focus on moving from our initial protopatterns to full patterns. Will this be the first time we have run a follow on workshop with the same users? I think it can be simpler than this. What we have at present are clearly protopatterns. If we are considering altering and expanding the form for full patterns (to be more akin to PLML) then we could introduce this as a second stage, leaving the current form as the protopattern form. What we then need is scaffolding for people to move from one stage to the next. I am working on that at the moment – we have a follow on workshop with the ALiC user group in the planning stage (will post details shortly) and this will focus on moving from our initial protopatterns to full patterns. Will this be the first time we have run a follow on workshop with the same users?

]]> By: yishaym http://patternlanguagenetwork.wordpress.com/2008/09/23/pattern-formats-and-structures/#comment-109 yishaym Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:03:21 +0000 http://patternlanguagenetwork.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-109 Thanks for the summary, Jim. Some of these ideas are already embodied in the <a href="http://patternlanguagenetwork.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Groups.pattern-x/pStruct" rel="nofollow">pattern scheme</a> we've started working on. Comments on that are very welcome. Other issues should be elucidated when we get down to writing up our methodology. I think it's time to start working on that. Thanks for the summary, Jim. Some of these ideas are already embodied in the pattern scheme we’ve started working on. Comments on that are very welcome.

Other issues should be elucidated when we get down to writing up our methodology. I think it’s time to start working on that.

]]>